Meeting Basic Survival Needs of the World's Least Healthy People - Toward a Framework Convention on Global Health
Professor of Global Health Law -
Research Paper No. 1, 2007 - Forthcoming Jan. 2008 -
Available online PDF [52p.] at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014082
“…..This article searches for solutions to the most perplexing problems in global health - problems so important that they affect the fate of millions of people, with economic, political, and security ramifications for the world's population. There are a variety of solutions scholars propose to improve global health and close the yawning health gap between rich and poor: global health is in the national interests of the major State powers; States owe an ethical duty to act; or international legal norms require effective action. However, arguments based on national interest, ethics, or international law, have logical weaknesses. The coincidence of national and global interests is much narrower than scholars claim. Ethical arguments unravel when searching questions are asked about who exactly has the duty to act and at what level of commitment. And international law has serious structural problems of application, definition, and enforcement.
What is truly needed, and which richer countries instinctively do for their own citizens, is to meet what I call “basic survival needs.” By focusing on the major determinants of health, the international community could dramatically improve prospects for good health. Basic survival needs include sanitation and sewage, pest control, clean air and water, tobacco reduction, diet and nutrition, essential medicines and vaccines, and functioning health systems. Meeting everyday survival needs may lack the glamour of high-technology medicine or dramatic rescue, but what they lack in excitement they gain in their potential impact on health, precisely because they deal with the major causes of common disease and disabilities across the globe.
If meeting basic survival needs can truly make a difference for the world's population then how can international law play a constructive role? What is required is an innovative way of structuring international obligations. A vehicle such as a Framework Convention on Global Health (FCGH) could powerfully improve global health governance. Such a Framework Convention would commit States to a set of targets, both economic and logistic, and dismantle barriers to constructive engagement by the private and charitable sectors. It would stimulate creative public/private partnerships and actively engage civil society stakeholders. A FCGH could set achievable goals for global health spending as a proportion of GNP; define areas of cost effective investment to meet basic survival needs; build sustainable health systems; and create incentives for scientific innovation for affordable vaccines and essential medicines. ….”
This article:
- First examines the compelling issue of global health equity, and inquires whether it is fair that people in poor countries suffer
such a disproportionate burden of disease and premature death.
- Second, the article explains a basic problem in global health: why health hazards seem to change form and migrate everywhere on the earth.
- Third, the article inquires why governments should care about serious health threats outside their borders, and explores
the alternative rationales: direct health benefits, economic benefits, and improved national security.
- Fourth, the article describes how the international community focuses on a few high profile, heart-rending, issues while largely
ignoring deeper, systemic problems in global health. By focusing on basic survival needs, the international community could
dramatically improve prospects for the world's population.
- Finally, the article explores the value of international law itself, and proposes an innovative mechanism for global health reform
a Framework Convention on Global Health….”
Faculty Director, O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law - Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001
V 202-662-9038 F 202-662-9055 http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/gostin.html and http://www.law.georgetown.edu/oneillinstitute/about.html
PDF file [52p.] at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?delivery_id=1014082&frd=yes
* * * *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues. [DD/ IKM Area]
"Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website: http://www.paho.org/
EQUITY List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.
