Tuesday, October 20, 2009

[EQ] Health Situation in the Americas: Basic Indicators 2009

Health Situation in the Americas: Basic Indicators 2009

Pan American Health Organization/ World Health Organization PAHO/WHO, 2009

Available online at:

http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=3050&Itemid=

“……Chronic noncommunicable diseases currently are reaching epidemic proportions in the Americas and are contributing substantially to overall mortality and disease burden in the Region. They result from complex and dynamic socially determined health processes, including epidemiological and demographic transitions. Once thought to be an issue primarily affecting the older population in high-income countries, chronic noncommunicable diseases are now affecting younger population segments and the poor in the lower-income countries of Latin America and the Caribbean.

 

The means for preventing and controlling most noncommunicable diseases are already well established and high-income countries—followed by middle-income countries— are now showing continuous progress in both prevention and control interventions. The low- and lower-middle-income countries, on the other hand, face the dual challenge of coping with scarce resources to address both noncommunicable and communicable diseases, as well as infant and maternal mortality.

 

Among chronic noncommunicable diseases, cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Americas, occurring increasingly within the working age population and thereby contributing disproportionately to the loss of potential years of healthy life and economic productivity. This situation is already recognized as a major and growing public health problem, particularly affecting low- and middle-income countries, but what is less recognized is the role of social disparities as determinants of the premature mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in the Region.

 

The purpose of this publication is to call the attention of the general public and the governments of the Americas to an exploratory analysis of the relationship between premature mortality due to cerebrovascular diseases (CeVD) and potential socioeconomic inequality determinants at the ecological level. The map on the first page of this brochure depicts the quintile distribution of proportional premature mortality due to cerebrovascular disease in the countries and territories of the Americas…..”    Mirta Roses, Director  PAHO/WHO

 

URL: http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1878&Itemid=229&lang=en

 

 

Español:

Situacion de salud en las Americas: Indicadores basicos 2009

Enlace: http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=3051&Itemid=

 


*      *     *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.  

[EQ] Principles of action to tackle social inequality in health - The Norwegian Directorate of Health - expert panel

The Norwegian Directorate of Health’s expert panel – social inequality in health:

Principles of action to tackle social inequality in health

 

A small document presenting Action principles to tackle social inequalities in health from a Norwegian interdisciplinary expert group of scientist within the field.

 

The document is both in Norwegian and English.

You will find the English part by scrolling down the document.

http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/vp/multimedia/archive/00093/_Handlingsprinsipper_93669a.pdf

 

The foreword by the Director General of Health explains the context of the document:

“The Norwegian Directorate of Health occupies a position in the interface between policy and science. Our goal is to translate the knowledge and advice of specialists into action. There are few areas where this is as important, and as difficult, as that of social inequality in health. In 2005 the Directorate adopted an action plan against social inequality in health, «The Challenge of the Gradient», and one of its main measures was to appoint a panel of experts in the field. The panel consisted of nine researchers from a variety of disciplines and institutions who had studied social inequality in health from a variety of different angles. The first challenge we gave the panel was to draw up a set of principles of action as a basis for a policy to reduce such inequalities. This publication presents the result.

The discussions between the experts on the panel took place in, and between, four meetings in 2005, and the principles were adopted in their final form at a meeting on 24 November 2005. The following month the Minister of Health and Care Services initiated a process that resulted in a white paper entitled National strategy to reduce social inequalities in health (Report No. 20 (2006–2007) to the Storting). The process was guided by the Principles of Action, and the final strategy was based largely on the panel’s recommendations. Thus the Principles of Action have already influenced national policy. By publishing them the Directorate hopes they will be used profitably at other decision-making levels and in other forums.

At an international level the Principles of Action are not unique. One of the forerunners was The Concepts and Principles for Equity and Health by the British expert Margaret Whitehead, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1992. What does appear to be unique about the present set of principles is that they are the result of consensus among the experts on the panel. When nine researchers from different institutions and with different disciplinary approaches manage to agree on a set of policy recommendations, we feel it is worth listening to them.

Bjørn-Inge Larsen

Directorate of Health”

 

 

Principles of action to tackle social inequality in health

 

·         1. It is a defined goal to reduce social inequality in health. This must be achieved without any deterioration of the average level of health or the health of the higher socioeconomic groups. The targets for reducing inequality must be quantified, and time limits must be defined for milestones.

·         2. Policies adopted to reduce social inequality in health must be knowledge based. The situation must be monitored, policies and measures must be evaluated, and health impact assessments must be carried out for important decisions made within and outside the health service. If existing knowledge is inadequate, measures should be initiated that are expected to have a positive effect and that are very unlikely to have negative consequences.
These kinds of measures must be evaluated especially thoroughly

·         3. Strategies to reduce social inequality in health are anchored in “the gradient”. This means giving priority to universally oriented population strategies. It may also be necessary to initiate special, target-oriented measures aimed at disadvantaged groups

·         4. To achieve the objective of reducing social inequality in health, in the short term and in the long term, direct measures aimed at specific health problems should be combined with indirect measures aimed at minimizing the structural causes of health problems.

·         5. Strategies to reduce social inequality in health should to be comprehensive and coordinated. This means combining a number of different public health perspectives and coordinating measures across social sectors and administrative levels.

·         6. A policy to reduce social inequality in health means attaching importance to reducing unfortunate social consequences of disease and impaired health, such as loss of work, especially in occupational groups with lower socioeconomic status.

From: Tone. P. Torgersen Seniorrådgiver/Senior Adviser Helsedirektoratet/Norwegian Directorate for Health


 


*      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho



    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.  

[EQ] London Review of Books: Who benefits from equality?

How messy it all is

David Runciman: Who benefits from equality?

Comment on:

The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better
by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett  

London Review of Books, 22 October 2009

            Available at: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n20/runc01_.html

 


“……There is enough evidence here that equality is a good thing to be able to take it on faith, and to move away from evidence-based politics towards a politics that is, for want of a better word, more ideological. Wilkinson and Pickett are committed to evidence-based politics because they seem to feel that ideology has had its day. ‘Political differences are more a reflection of different beliefs about the solution to problems than of disagreements about what the problems are,’ they write. ‘Almost everyone, regardless of their politics, would prefer to live in a safer and more friendly society.’ But they also reveal a hankering for something more. ‘For several decades progressive politics have been seriously weakened by the loss of any concept of a better society. People have argued for piecemeal improvements in different areas of life . . .

 

But nowhere is there a popular movement capable of inspiring people with a vision of how to make society a substantially better place to live for the vast majority. Without that vision, politics will rarely provoke more than a yawn.’ More equality is a good thing and it’s an idea that’s worth defending. It would be nice if there were more politicians willing to stand up and defend it, however they saw fit. That may be wishful thinking. But so too is the idea of an evidence-based politics, which just opens the door to all the prevarications of joined-up thinking…..”

David Runciman teaches politics at Cambridge.
He is the author of Pluralism and the Personality of the State, The Politics of Good Intentions and Political Hypocrisy.


*      *     *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho


    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.