Health Equity: 03/31/11

Thursday, March 31, 2011

[EQ] Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) Framework for Capacity Strengthening in Health Research - ESSENCE

ESSENCE - harmonizing policies and practices of research funders

Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) Framework for Capacity Strengthening in Health Research

ESSENCE Secretariat :
TDR, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases executed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and co-sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, the World Bank and WHO
ESSENCE Good practice document series – January 2011

The PM&E Framework is posted at: http://bit.ly/eXTHtu

“…..Enhancing Support for Strengthening the Effectiveness of National Capacity Efforts (ESSENCE on Health Research) is a collaborative framework between funding agencies to scale up research capacity for health. It aims to improve the impact of investments in institutions and people, and provides enabling mechanisms that address needs and priorities within national strategies on research for health.

ESSENCE members embrace the principles of donor harmonization and country alignment. According to these principles, donors/funders should align with priorities of countries in which they work, and harmonize their actions and procedures to facilitate complementarity among funders and to reduce administrative overload for recipients of funding. To achieve these goals, ESSENCE members jointly developed and produced good practice documents that incorporate current best knowledge and practice on health research and development issues. This Framework is the first ESSENCE good practice document….”

Content:

Introduction
     1 Shared principles on the "how-to" of capacity strengthening
        2 A PM&E matrix with key indicators
        3 Lessons learned
PART I: Shared principles on the "how-to" of capacity strengthening
PART II: PM&E matrix with key indicators - definitions of key concepts
PART III: Lessons learned
Sources

Contact: Dr Garry Aslanyan Manager, Portfolio Policy, WHO/TDR aslanyang@who.int

* * *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues. [DD/ KMC Area]
Washington DC USA

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website
Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho

IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission.

Thank you.

[EQ] Assessing Proposals for Global Health Governance Reform

Student Voices 2:
Assessing Proposals for Global Health Governance Reform

Edited by Steven J. Hoffman

Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University

Adjunct Faculty, McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University
Research Fellow, Global Health Diplomacy Program, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto

McMaster Health Forum, March 2011
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada - ISBN 978-1-894088-27-5

Available online [180p.] at: http://bit.ly/hGpkir

“…This edited volume offers evidence-based assessments of thirteen existing proposals for global health governance reform. These include proposals that call for the creation of or a larger role for the:

1. Health 8 (H8)

2. Committee C of the World Health Assembly

3. International Health Partnership and Related initiatives (IHP+)

4. Group of 8 (G8)

5. Global Fund for Health

6. Biosecurity Concert

7. World Development Organization

8. Networked Governance

9. Global Action Networks

10. Framework Convention on Global Health

11. Global Plan for Justice

12. Issue-Specific Global Health Laws

13. Health Impact Fund

Each chapter relies on an extensive review of the available research evidence and a broad range of insights to: (a) summarize the key elements of each proposed global health governance reform; (b) identify the needs it seeks to address; (c) examine the extent to which it could strengthen global health governance and ameliorate known weaknesses in its existing architecture; (d) analyze the proposal’s political attractiveness; (e) raise implementation considerations such as costs, risks, possible harms, feasibility and equity; and (f) offer recommendations on whether the proposal should be further explored for possible implementation.

A common analytical framework was developed and utilized to help structure each chapter and ensure a comprehensive approach to each assessment. For example, when examining the extent to which each proposal may address the various challenges facing global health governance, the authors used Gostin and Mok’s six “grand challenges in global health governance” as their evaluation criteria for assessing the merit of each proposal. The use of a common analytical framework also offered the added benefit of enhancing comparability across the examined proposals (see Tables 1-3).

The authors of this report are all students at McMaster University who prepared these essays for the fourth-year undergraduate Law & Disorder in Global Health (HTH SCI 4LD3) course, offered from September to December 2010 by the Bachelor of Health Sciences (Honours) Program in collaboration with the McMaster Health Forum. In publishing this report, it is our belief that today’s students have an important role to play in global health decision-making for both their innovative ideas and future leadership of the global health community. Through this publication, it is hoped that these students can help shape the future of global health governance reform while preparing themselves to confront tomorrow’s greatest challenges…”