Student Voices 2:
Assessing Proposals for Global Health Governance Reform
Edited by Steven J. Hoffman
Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics,
Adjunct Faculty, McMaster Health Forum,
Research Fellow, Global Health Diplomacy Program,
McMaster Health Forum, March 2011
Available online [180p.] at: http://bit.ly/hGpkir
“…This edited volume offers evidence-based assessments of thirteen existing proposals for global health governance reform. These include proposals that call for the creation of or a larger role for the:
1. Health 8 (H8)
2. Committee C of the World Health Assembly
3. International Health Partnership and Related initiatives (IHP+)
4. Group of 8 (G8)
5. Global Fund for Health
6. Biosecurity Concert
7. World Development Organization
8. Networked Governance
9. Global Action Networks
10. Framework Convention on Global Health
11. Global Plan for Justice
12. Issue-Specific Global Health Laws
13. Health Impact Fund
Each chapter relies on an extensive review of the available research evidence and a broad range of insights to: (a) summarize the key elements of each proposed global health governance reform; (b) identify the needs it seeks to address; (c) examine the extent to which it could strengthen global health governance and ameliorate known weaknesses in its existing architecture; (d) analyze the proposal’s political attractiveness; (e) raise implementation considerations such as costs, risks, possible harms, feasibility and equity; and (f) offer recommendations on whether the proposal should be further explored for possible implementation.
A common analytical framework was developed and utilized to help structure each chapter and ensure a comprehensive approach to each assessment. For example, when examining the extent to which each proposal may address the various challenges facing global health governance, the authors used Gostin and Mok’s six “grand challenges in global health governance” as their evaluation criteria for assessing the merit of each proposal. The use of a common analytical framework also offered the added benefit of enhancing comparability across the examined proposals (see Tables 1-3).
The authors of this report are all students at
* * *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues. [DD/ KMC Area]
“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website
Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho
IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission.
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment