Tuesday, August 19, 2008

[EQ] The Nordic Experience: Welfare States and Public Health

The Nordic Experience: Welfare States and Public Health


Olle Lundberg, Monica Åberg Yngwe, Maria Kölegård Stjärne, Lisa Björk, Johan Fritzell

 

Health Equity Studies No 12 - August 2008

Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS) Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet

 

Available online as PDF file [229p.] at: http://www.chess.su.se/content/1/c6/04/65/23/NEWS_Rapport_080819.pdf

 

 

“…..Although diseases and their consequences in terms of suffering, reduced function and premature mortality are biological events taking place in human

organs, their ultimate causes are often social rather than biological in nature.


The social aspects of disease and mortality are particularly central when we discuss ways to improve the health of nations and populations. Biological disease processes are clearly important, but the distribution of health risks, including biological ones such as exposure to certain bacteria, is usually socially determined. Prevention, therefore, is largely an issue of social rather than biological change. This is also true for the treatment of disease as long as the availability of medical care and proper medication are not distributed on the basis of need only.


Hence, the social distribution of determinants of health is central to the improvement of public health, both inside and between countries. For example, the consequences of HIV for the human immune system are certainly the result of biological processes, while the AIDS epidemic is very much a consequence of poverty, poor education and unequal power relations between men and women.

 

The same could be said for TB and other contagious diseases throughout history; improving people’s social conditions through schooling, poverty reduction and better housing, are important means for combating disease. Needless to say, medical interventions such as immunisation and treatment are also important, but there is a social dimension to these services too. While the examples above refer to infectious diseases, there is a social distribution of determinants also for chronic diseases, and this is true for rich and poor countries alike.


Over the past century, social developments have brought about massive improvements in economic, social and political conditions for most people in many countries. The ‘state’ has been transformed into the ‘welfare state’, and ‘citizenship’ into ‘social citizenship’ (see Marshall, 1950), at least in the West. However, while many countries have become richer and implemented social and political reforms, there are clear differences in the way they have designed their welfare state institutions.

 

These differences tend to be characterised according to the differing relative importance of the market, the state and the family for the provision of protection and services. In other words, the main responsibility for common problems faced by most individuals in all societies, such as care of small children and of the old, health care, schooling, and economic security for the sick, the unemployed and the old, can be given primarily to the individual through the market, or to the family, or to the state.

 

The Nordic countries are usually seen as a specific type of welfare state in which the state has assumed a greater than usual responsibility for social protection and care services. The Nordic welfare states have also been regarded as consciously promoting class and gender equality, high labour market participation, low poverty rates and a high degree of social participation.

 

How might the Nordic experience of social development through active policy-making be of relevance for the WHO and its Commission on Social Determinants of Health? There are at least two points we wish to highlight here. Firstly, the growth of the welfare state in the Nordic countries has been accompanied by considerable improvements in public health. Several of the Nordic countries were world leaders in life expectancy and infant mortality throughout the 20th century.

Secondly, the Nordic welfare state model has had the explicit goal of strengthening and expanding the resources available to its citizens through welfare state institutions. Rather than being solely dependent on the resources generated by the market or within the family, Nordic citizens have in addition been able to draw on resources provided by the welfare state. Thus, the economic consequences of reduced working ability due to sickness or old age have been cushioned, the professionalization of care for children and the old has relieved families of care burdens, and public day-care and public schooling of high quality for all children has evened out differences in life chances.

 

Although many of these social policies were implemented to achieve a better society for the majority of citizens rather than primarily to improve public health, they seem incidentally to have targeted factors that constitute the core social determinants of health. But while an association between social policies and public health seems highly plausible there is a need for more systematic evidence on the issue. In this report we will therefore make a first attempt to provide analyses of the extent to which the Nordic welfare state model has actually contributed to improved public health, and we will do so on basis of new as well as existing research from a variety of disciplines…..”

 

Content:

Foreword

I. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Why is the Nordic Experience interesting?

1.2 The analytical framework

1.2.1 Welfare state institutions and public health outcomes – a general model

1.2.2 Comparisons across time and space – country clusters and institutional variability

1.3 The report – what it is and what it is not

1.3.1 Delimitations and choices

1.3.2 Structure of the report

II. NORDIC COUNTRIES: SOCIETIES AND WELFARE

2.1 The Nordic countries, past and present

2.2 Characteristics of the Nordic model

2.2.1 The Nordic model and welfare state typologies

2.3 Welfare regimes or institutional characteristics?

2.4 Education, equality and stratification

III. HEALTH AND HEALTH INEQUALITIES: THE NORDIC COUNTRIES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

3.1 Levels and trends in life expectancy and mortality

3.1.1 Development of life expectancy and mortality in the Nordic countries during the 20th century

3.1.2 Mortality and life expectancy: the Nordic countries compared to other high income countries

3.2 The size of and trends in mortality variations across countries

3.2.1 Variability in the age of death – the individual level

3.2.2 Social inequalities in mortality

3.3 Mortality in Nordic countries – Concluding discussion

 

IV. GENERAL POLICY FEATURES AND PUBLIC HEALTH

4.1 Poverty, income redistribution and health

4.1.1 Poverty risks and poverty alleviation

4.1.2 Income redistribution and health

4.1.3 Income and health – evidence and explanations for the individual level relationship

4.1.4 Income inequality and health

4.1.5 Poverty, income redistribution and health – summing up the discussion

4.2 Welfare state development and life expectancy

4.2.1 GDP and life expectancy

4.2.2 Age of the social insurance system and life expectancy

4.2.3 Social spending and life expectancy

4.2.4 Social rights and life expectancy

4.2.5 Pooled cross-sectional time-series analysis

V. POLICY AREAS

5.1 Family and Children

5.1.1 From population policy to family policy institutions – the historical background

5.1.2 Stockholm at the turn of the 19th century – a case study of infant vulnerability in an urban context

5.1.3 Modern family policy in a comparative perspective

5.1.4 The impact of family policy institutions on infant mortality – comparative analyses of 18 OECD countries

5.1.5 Family policy institutions, labour force participation and health among women – cross sectional comparisons of 18 OECD countries

5.2 Nordic alcohol policies and the welfare state

5.2.1 Two centuries of waves of alcohol consumption: serious problems and strong responses

5.2.2 Social class and the old Nordic alcohol control systems

5.2.3 Nordic alcohol controls in recent decades: The total consumption model

5.2.4 Nordic alcohol policies today, in a broad perspective

5.3 Health care and dental care systems

5.3.1 The Nordic experience of dental care and dental health

5.4 Pension systems and health of elderly people

5.4.1 Pension rights and their potential importance for health

5.4.2 Public pensions and old-age mortality

5.4.3 Public pensions and ill-health among retired persons

VI. LESSONS LEARNED

6.1. Welfare policy and health development – summarizing findings with the help of a conceptual framework

6.1.1 Social determinants and consequences of ill-health - a chronic issue in welfare policies

6.1.2 Policy entry points illustrated by examples of Nordic social and health policy.

6.2 Applicability

6.2.1 Applicability, development and type of relevance

6.2.2 Applicability and relevance of specific analyses and results

6.3 Conclusion and general observations

6.3.1 Policy foundations – the importance of data and monitoring

6.3.2 Policy content – important general features

6.3.3 Policy implementation – how to make it happen

6.3.4 Policy evaluation – what is good and what is not

6.3.5 General observations and final remarks


Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Appendix 3

REFERENCES

 

Core team of researchers at CHESS: Professor Olle Lundberg, Professor Johan Fritzell, PhD Monica Åberg Yngwe, PhD Maria Kölegård Stjärne and MSc Lisa Björk.

A Nordic group of experts: Professor Espen Dahl, Oslo University College, Professor Finn Diderichsen, Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Professor Jon Ivar Elstad, NOVA, Oslo, PhD Hólmfriður Kolbrún Gunnarsdóttir, Research Center for Occupational Health & Working Life, Reykjavik, PhD Mikko Kautto, The National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES), Helsinki/ Centre for Pensions, Helsinki, Professor Olli Kangas, Institute for Social Research, Copenhagen and KELA, Helsinki, Professor Eero Lahelma, Dept of Public Health, University

 

 

 

 

*      *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]


“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PAHO/WHO Website: http://www.paho.org/

EQUITY List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

 

 

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.  

[EQ] High-level forum on Aid Effectiveness - Evaluation of the Paris Declaration

Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

Accra, Ghana;  2- 4 September 2008

Hosted by the government of Ghana and organised by OECD's Development Co-operation Directorate, with the participation of the OECD Secretary-General , multilateral banks and the United Nations.


Website: http://www.accrahlf.net/  

“….In September 2008, ministers from over 100 countries, heads of bilateral and multilateral development agencies, donor organizations, and civil society organizations from around the world will gather in Accra for the Third High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (2-4 September). Their common objective is to help developing countries and marginalized people in their fight against poverty by making aid more transparent, accountable and results-oriented.

The Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (Third HLF) will:
- review progress in improving aid effectiveness
- broaden the dialogue to newer actors
- chart a course for continuing international action on aid effectiveness…”



Synthesis Report on the First Phase of the ;
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration,

Wood, B; Kabell, D; Sagasti, F; Muwanga, N. http://www.diis.dk/sw65053.asp

Ministry of Foreign Aff airs of Denmark. Danish Institute for International Studies. July 2008

 

            English [56p.] at: http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Subweb/paris_evaluation_web/files/pdf/eng/ENG-Report-chap1-5.pdf

 

French: http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Subweb/paris_evaluation_web/files/pages/french.html

 

Spanish: http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Subweb/paris_evaluation_web/files/pages/spanish.html

 

“….The Paris Declaration poses an important challenge both to the world of development cooperation in general and to the field of development evaluation. Compared with previous joint statements on aid harmonisation and alignment, it provides a practical, action-oriented roadmap with specific targets to be met by 2010.

 

The overall purpose of the evaluation is to assess the relevance and effectiveness of the Paris Declaration and its contribution to aid effectiveness …”

 

Content:

 

I. Introduction

The Context for the Implementation of the Paris Declaration

Synthesis of Evaluation Findings I Ownership

II   Alignment

III  Harmonisation

IV Managing for Results

V Mutual Accountability

VI Partner Country Assessments of the Paris Declaration as a Tool for Aid Eff ectiveness

VII Are the Required Commitments, Capacities and Incentives in Place?

Broader Conclusions and Issues around the Implementation of the Paris Declaration as a Whole

Key Lessons and Recommendations

 

 

*      *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PAHO/WHO Website: http://www.paho.org/

EQUITY List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

 

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.  

[EQ] Population Aging and Economic Growth

Population Aging and Economic Growth

 

David Bloom, Clarence James Gamble Professor of Economics & Demography and Chair, Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard School of Public Health.

David Canning, Professor of Economics and International Health, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health.
Günther Fink, Assistant Professor of International Health Economics, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health.

Commission on Growth and Development, 2008

 

Available online as PDF file [48p.] at: http://www.growthcommission.org/storage/cgdev/documents/gcwp032web.pdf

 

 

“……Between 2000 and 2050, the share of the population aged 60 and over is projected to increase in every country in the world; the same is true for the 80+ population in all but one country (Mali). Worldwide, the largest absolute increases are yet to come.

Although labor force participation rates are projected to decline from 2000 to 2040 in most countries, due mainly to changes in their age distributions, labor force-to-population ratios will actually increase in most countries. This is because low fertility will cause lower youth dependency that is more than enough to offset the skewing of adults toward the older ages at which labor force participation is lower. The increase in labor-force-to-population ratios will be further magnified by increases in age-specific rates of female labor force participation associated with fertility declines. These factors suggest that economic growth will continue apace, notwithstanding the phenomenon of population aging.

 

For the OECD countries, the declines projected to occur in both labor force participation and labor-force-to-population ratios suggest modest declines in the pace of economic growth. But even these effects can be mitigated by behavioral responses to population aging—in the form of higher savings for retirement, greater labor force participation, and increased immigration from labor-surplus to labor-deficit countries.

 

Countries that can facilitate such changes may be able to limit the adverse consequences of population aging. When seen through the lens of several mitigating considerations, there is reason to think that population aging in developed countries may have less effect than some have predicted. In addition, policy responses related to retirement incentives, pension funding methods, investments in health care of the elderly, and immigration can further ameliorate the effect of population aging on economic growth…..”

 

 

Contents

I. Introduction
II. Population Aging: Facts, Force, and Future

III. The Economic Impacts of Population Aging

IV. Summary and Discussion
References

 

 

 

This working paper is a product of the Commission on Growth and Development, which is sponsored by the following organizations:

Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)

U.K. Department of International Development (DFID)

The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

The World Bank Group

 

 

*      *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PAHO/WHO Website: http://www.paho.org/

EQUITY List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

 

 

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.