Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT
Rebecca Armstrong, Senior Research Fellow1,2,
Elizabeth Waters, Professorial Fellow, Public Health and Health Equity1,2
Laurence Moore, Professor and Director3
Elisha Riggs, Research Fellow2
Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Unit Chief, Research Promotion and Development4
Pisake Lumbiganon, Professor in Ob & Gyn5
Penelope Hawe, Professor, Markin Chair in Health and Society & Alberta Heritage, Foundation for Medical Research Health Scientist6
Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on January 19, 2008
Published by
Website: http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/fdm082v1
Background Evidence-based public health decision-making depends on high quality and transparent accounts of what interventions are effective, for whom, how and at what cost. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized and non-randomized study designs through the CONSORT and TREND statements has had a marked impact on the quality of study designs. However, public health users of systematic reviews have been concerned with the paucity of synthesized information on context, development and rationale, implementation processes and sustainability factors.
Methods This paper examines the existing reporting frameworks for research against information sought by users of systematic reviews of public health interventions and suggests additional items that should be considered in future recommendations on the reporting of public health interventions.
Results Intervention model, theoretical and ethical considerations, study design choice, integrity of intervention/process evaluation, context, differential effects and inequalities and sustainability are often overlooked in reports of public health interventions.
Conclusion Population health policy makers need synthesized, detailed and high quality a priori accounts of effective interventions in order to make better progress in tackling population morbidities and inequalities. Adding simple criteria to reporting standards will significantly improve the quality and usefulness of published evidence and increase its impact on public health program planning.
Authors:
1 Cochrane Health Promotion and Public Health Field, VicHealth,
2 The McCaughey Centre: the VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing,
3
4 Pan American Health Organization (WHO/PAHO),
5 Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine,
6 Population Health Intervention Research Centre,
* * * *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues. [DD/ IKM Area]
“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website: http://www.paho.org/
EQUITY List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment