Monday, August 25, 2008

[EQ] Effective Dissemination of Findings from Research - a compilation of essays

Effective Dissemination of Findings from Research – a compilation of essays

 

The Institute of Health Economics (IHE), Alberta Canada, 2008

 

Available online [PDF 88p.]at: http://www.ihe.ca/documents/Dissemination.pdf

 

“…..The effective dissemination of findings from health-related research – implying consideration of these findings by clinicians, policy makers, and consumers in reaching decisions – poses many challenges. In health care, there has been increasing recognition of the need to facilitate the transfer of research evidence

into clinical practice and policy development. Considerable sums are spent on research, but concern continues that relevant findings are too often not

appreciated or taken up by those who might benefit.

 

Dissemination, also referred to in this publication as Knowledge Transfer (KT) and Knowledge Transfer and Exchange (KTE), is a process that goes far beyond just distributing accounts and results of research. Distribution of findings is an important issue and vehicles for distribution (such as reports, journals, and the Internet) will need consideration as they vary in their coverage, timeliness, and cost. However, the essence of effective dissemination is that it is an interactive exchange between researchers and those they are intending to influence. In the field of health technology assessment (HTA), a study undertaken by EUR-ASSESS distinguished between diffusion
– a passive process by which information is spread; dissemination – an active process of spreading a message to defined target groups; and implementation

– a more active process which includes interventions to reduce or remove barriers to change, and activities to promote change (Granados et al., 1987).


A major intent of research dissemination is to provide and use information as input to decisions or policies that might require a change in behaviour or

attitude on behalf of the target audience. This indicates the need for active promotion of the desired message. Approaches taken will depend on the target

audience as well as the specifics of the research. One of the challenges may be matching the research findings to the wider perspectives or requirements

of the groups who are being addressed…”

 

“….The essays presented in this book have grown out of a workshop on effective dissemination of findings from research organized by the Institute of Health Economics (IHE), that was held two years ago at the University of Alberta. The publication includes some of the material presented at that workshop. It is intended as one of the many available resources on dissemination of research findings for those interested in the subject….”

 

Table of Contents

Foreword

Chapter 1.

Chapter 2. Knowledge translation of research findings

Introduction

What should be transferred?

To whom should knowledge be transferred and with what effect?.

With what effect should knowledge be transferred?.

How should research knowledge be transferred?.

Effectiveness of professional behaviour change strategies

Effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies focusing on patients

Effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies focusing

on policy makers and senior health service managers

Summary

References

Chapter 3. Knowledge Transfer and Exchange (KTE): a systematic review, key informant interviews and design of a KTE strategy

Introduction

Background.

Methods
Systematic review

Stakeholder interviews

Results

Discussion

Summary of findings

Developing a KTE strategy

A three phased KTE ‘intervention’.

Conclusion.

References

Appendix A: Steps in the systematic review.

Appendix B: Summary of KTE implementation studies identified in the literature.

Chapter 4. SBU’s Ambassador Program in Northern Sweden

The Swedish Health Care System

The Swedish Council on Technology

Assessment in Health Care

The SBU Ambassador Program

The SBU North Ambassador Program

Has the Ambassador Program served its purpose?

References

Chapter 5. The Alberta HTA Chronic Pain Ambassador Program: an Alberta adaptation of the SBU clinical Ambassador Program

Lessons learned

Conclusions and implications

References

Chapter 6. CADTH’s Liaison Program

References

 

 

 

*      *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMS Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website: http://www.paho.org
Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

 

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.  

No comments: