Wednesday, October 29, 2008

[EQ] Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking

Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking

 

Debra Fayter1; Caroline Main1; Kate Misso1; David Ogilvie2; Mark Petticrew3; Amanda Sowden1

Lisa Stirk1; Sian Thomas2; Margaret Whitehead4; Gillian Worthy1

1 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York.

2 MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (MRC SPHSU), University of Glasgow.

3 Public and Environmental Health Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

4 Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool.


Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, CRD Report 39. York: University of York. 2008

 

Available online as PDF file  [322p.] at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/CRD_Reports/crdreport39.pdf

 

Reducing social inequalities in smoking and its health consequences is a public-health and political priority: the Department of Health has a specific target to reduce the prevalence of smoking in „manual groups from 32% to 26% by 2015. Although the extent and causes of health inequalities have been extensively researched, we know remarkably little about the actual effects of measures to reduce such inequalities in general or about the differential impacts of tobacco control measures in particular. It is possible that a strategy which successfully reduces smoking in the population overall might widen inequalities if its benefits

are concentrated among the better-off.

 

The overall aims of this project were:

To synthesise the best available evidence about the differential effects of population tobacco control interventions on groups with different sociodemographic characteristics

To assess which interventions are likely to be effective in reducing smoking related health inequalities and to identify reasons why other interventions may be ineffective, attempting to answer the questions: What works? What might work? For whom? In what contexts?

 

To extend systematic review methods by integrating existing, related systematic reviews and the primary studies included in those reviews into a new systematic review, taking a broad view of the types of evidence which are available in seeking to answer a policy-relevant question, and To identify where evidence is lacking and to suggest areas where further primary or secondary research is required.


The project comprised two parts. Part 1 is a review of existing systematic reviews and Part 2 is a new systematic review of primary studies.

 

Content:


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND


PART 1 : A REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

TABLES & FIGURES

Figure 1 Quality assessment of included reviews

Table 1 Selected characteristics of included reviews

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Search strategy and terms

Appendix 2 Quality assessment of the nineteen reviews included in the review of reviews

Appendix 3 Primary studies included in the nineteen systematic reviews

Appendix 4 Map of primary studies included in more than one systematic review

Appendix 5 Data extraction tables


PART 2: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

1. Introduction

2. Methods

2.1 Search methods

2.2 Inclusion/exclusion criteria

2.3 Data extraction and quality assessment

2.4 Data synthesis

2.5 Additional data

2.6 Advisory panel

3. Results

3.1 Effects of restrictions on smoking in workplaces and public places

3.2 Effects of restrictions on smoking in schools

3.3 Effects of restrictions on sales to minors

3.4 Effects of health warnings on tobacco products

3.5 Effects of restrictions on advertising of tobacco products

3.6 Effects of price of tobacco products on adults

3.7 Effects of price on young people

3.8 Effects of multi-faceted interventions

3.9. Overall Matrix for all included interventions

4. Discussion and conclusions

4.1 Findings and implications

4.2 Strengths and weaknesses of the review

4.3 Limitations of the evidence

4.4 Unanswered questions and future research

References

FIGURES

APPENDICES

Appendix A Search strategy

Appendix B List of included studies by intervention category

Appendix C List of studies excluded from the systematic review

Appendix D Data extraction tables

Appendix E Table of study suitability and quality

Appendix F Table indicating evidence for social gradient in effectiveness

Appendix G Advisory panel

 

 *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMS Area]

"Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

 

 

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.  

No comments: