[EQ] Setting priorities for global mental health research

Setting priorities for global mental health research

Mark Tomlinson ^a, Igor Rudan ^b, Shekhar Saxena ^c, Leslie Swartz ^a, Alexander C Tsai ^d & Vikram Patel ^e
a. Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
b. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland.
c. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
d. Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
e. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London

Bulletin of the World Health Organization - Volume 87, Number 6, June 2009, 405-484

 

Available online at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/6/08-054353/en/index.html

“…..To set investment priorities in global mental health research and to propose a more rational use of funds in this under-resourced and under-investigated area.

METHODS

Members of the Lancet Mental Health Group systematically listed and scored research investment options on four broad classes of disorders: schizophrenia and other major psychotic disorders, major depressive disorder and other common mental disorders, alcohol abuse and other substance abuse disorders, and the broad class of child and adolescent mental disorders. Using the priority-setting approach of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, the group listed various research questions and evaluated them using the criteria of answerability, effectiveness, deliverability, equity and potential impact on persisting burden of mental health disorders. Scores were then weighted according to the system of values expressed by a larger group of stakeholders.

FINDINGS

The research questions that scored highest were related to health policy and systems research, where and how to deliver existing cost-effective interventions in a low-resource context, and epidemiological research on the broad categories of child and adolescent mental disorders or those pertaining to alcohol and drug abuse questions. The questions that scored lowest related to the development of new interventions and new drugs or pharmacological agents, vaccines or other technologies.

CONCLUSION

In the context of global mental health and with a time frame of the next 10 years, it would be best to fill critical knowledge gaps by investing in research into health policy and systems, epidemiology and improved delivery of cost-effective interventions….”

 

 

 *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMS Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/eqpaho

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

 

    IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by email to infosec@paho.org, and please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.