[EQ] A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems

A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems

Rifat Atun,1, Thyra de Jongh, 2 Federica Secci, 3 Kelechi Ohiri 4 and Olusoji Adeyi 4,5

1 Professor of International Health Management, Imperial College London, UK, 2 Researcher, Centre for Health Management, Imperial College London, UK, 3 Doctoral Researcher, Centre for Health Management, Imperial College London, UK, 4 Health Specialist, Human Development Network, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA and 5 Coordinator of Public Health Programs, Human Development Network, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

Available online at: http://bit.ly/8Y1zrv

 

“……..A longstanding debate on health systems organization relates to benefits of integrating health programmes that emphasize specific interventions into mainstream health systems to increase access and improve health outcomes.

This debate has long been characterized by polarization of views and ideologies, with protagonists for and against integration arguing the relative merits of each approach. However, all too frequently these arguments have not been based on hard evidence. The presence of both integrated and non-integrated programmes in many countries suggests there may be benefits to either approach, but the relative merits of integration in various contexts and for different interventions have not been systematically analysed and documented.

 

In this paper we present findings of a systematic review that explores a broad range of evidence on:
(i) the extent and nature of the integration of targeted health programmes that emphasize specific interventions into critical health systems functions,
(ii) how the integration or non-integration of health programmes into critical health systems functions in different contexts has influenced programme success,
(iii) how contextual factors have affected the extent to which these programmes were integrated into critical health systems functions.

 

Our analysis shows few instances where there is full integration of a health intervention or where an intervention is completely non-integrated. Instead, there exists a highly heterogeneous picture both for the nature and also for the extent of integration. Health systems combine both non-integrated and integrated interventions, but the balance of these interventions varies considerably…………”

 

 

*      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website
Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho

IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission. 

Thank you.