[EQ] Validity and Comparability of Out-of-pocket Health Expenditure from Household Surveys

Validity and Comparability of Out-of-pocket Health Expenditure from Household Surveys:
A review of the literature and current survey instruments

Richard Heijink, Ke Xu, Priyanka Saksena and David Evans

Series: Department of Health Systems Financing (WHO, Geneva) Discussion Paper Series, 01/2011

Available online PDF file [30p.] at: http://bit.ly/i9rOVG

Objective:
 Measurement errors have been a persistent concern in survey research. In this study we investigate the current evidence on measurement errors in self-reported household expenditure and health expenditure.

Methodology: 
We performed a review of the literature on measurement error in healthcare-related surveys. A Pubmed-search was performed and in addition reference tracking was used. In the second part of the study we examined current survey instruments. We collected 90 household surveys, such as household budget surveys, from the International Household Survey Network. We included surveys that were conducted after 1990, with a focus on low-income countries and studied differences in survey design features.

Results:
The literature review demonstrated that the probability of misreporting increases when the time between interview and event increases. Also, longer and shorter recall periods have generated different outcomes, although the magnitude of this difference varied across populations. Furthermore, respondents reported higher aggregate household spending when more items were used. Respondents may also lose motivation in long-term diaries. Some studies found a relationship between measurement error and respondent characteristics, although results were inconsistent. The review of current household surveys showed a non-negligible variation in design features such as the recall period, the number of disaggregation items and the wording of questions.

Conclusion:
From reviewing the existing studies and literature we did not find evidence of the optimal survey design features in collecting data on health spending. However, some practical suggestions emerge from the study in terms of question design, recall period and methods of data collection. The study strongly suggests the need for validation studies in order to improve survey instruments and data quality. In the meantime, standardization could improve the comparability across countries and surveys, yet this may discourage the efforts on further exploring the best survey instruments and compromise within-country, over-time comparison efforts.

 

Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho

 *      *      *     *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PAHO/WHO Website: http://new.paho.org/equity/

EQUITY List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html

Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho

 

IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission.

Thank you.